Comments on: “Prince of Pot” sparks drug debate

By: CheebaHawk

CheebaHawk — Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:35:47 +0000

The amount of time that is used in our already congested judicial system. As well as the money spent on court fee’s and prison upkeep, should be reason alone to reconsider our drug policy. Maybe now that our generation is facing an astronomical debt, we will be forced to reconsider our glutenous ways.

By: Katie $

Katie $ — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:21:37 +0000

whta bruce darnell is saying is very true. this “war on drugs” is to fatten the wallets of our government politicians. they say y make it legal when we already make so much of 3 stems ($356 fine) which is what i got, rather than an under age smoking ($72) or underage drinking at .02 ($130) this is just in WI. they should make it if you grow it for your own purpose then go ahead it’s 10x healthier than an cig or beer. no brain damage or recked liver, just hungery…

By: Big Jake

Big Jake — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:21:15 +0000

All of the above statements have merit. America’s politic’s have twisted the truth once again. We call our selves a Nation “Land of the Free.” No Sir, this is not a true statement. As our current President has placed our Nation in further debt, any free thoughts on pot would have a larger portion of our fellow Americans choosing to not support his ideas. We need to change the way we address our daily challenges on taxes, laws, the way we all have to live together. Having pot a criminal action is just stupid. Show mw a leader with some vision and once again just maybe we can get this Nation of ours backon the proper path with a “Voice of Reason.” Thanks for reading.

By: M. Simon

M. Simon — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:41:09 +0000

Sexually Abused Females Shoot Up Heroin